Use of electronic cigarettes, popularly referred to as e- cigarettes, has helped greater than six million smokers within the European Union give up smoking, estimates a new study. Additionally, the researchers learned that use of e-cigarettes has helped more than nine million Europeans to cut smoking consumption. “These are probably the highest rates of quitting smoking and reduction ever observed in such a large population study,” said principal investigator of the study Konstantinos Farsalinos from University of Patras, Rio, Greece.
For the study, they analysed the information from your 2014 Eurobarometer on smoking and the use of the electronic cigarettes among an agent sample of 27,460 Europeans. Eurobarometer is a survey performed by the European Commission, assessing, and others, smoking and electronic cigarette use patterns in all 28 member states from the European Union. The analysis, accepted for publication within the journal Addiction, also learned that making use e-cigarettes has largely been confined to smokers, with minimal use by non-smokers.
“The European Union data demonstrate that the usage of electronic cigarettes may have a positive impact on public health for 2 significant reasons – high quitting smoking and reduction rates are observed, and E Cigarette use is essentially restricted to smokers (current and former), with minimal use by non-smokers,” Farsalinos noted.
There is a lot of controversy over the usage of the e cigarettes by non-smokers, but researchers appeared reassuring. Just 1.3 percent of non-smokers reported current utilization of nicotine-containing e cigarettes and .09 percent reported daily use, the analysis said. A Perth man has lost an effort to overturn a conviction for selling electronic cigarettes in Western Australia.
Vincent Van Heerden, 33, was convicted by the Supreme Court in 2014 of breaching tobacco control laws by selling e-cigarettes online. The landmark case effectively made the sale of the electronic smoking devices illegal in WA. The gpoxvh turn fluid into vapour which can be inhaled, and Van Heerden maintained he believed they were a wholesome substitute for cigarettes.
He appealed the verdict within the Court of Appeal, but the case was dismissed. Outside the court, Van Heerden said he was shocked from the decision. “It doesn’t make any sense coming from a sound judgment point of view, from the moral viewpoint and from a legal perspective. I don’t comprehend it,” he stated.
“I think society has been done an enormous disservice today. This was a technology that is saving lives all across the globe. “They’ve been shown to be 95 per cent safer than actual tobacco cigarettes.” Van Heerden’s home was raided by Health Department officials in the year 2011, and that he was later charged with breaching state regulations by selling a product or service that resembled a cigarette.